How close is TOO close to a LIQUEFACTION ZONE?

I am considering the purchase of a house in California. According to the California Emergency Management Agency (http://myhazards.calema.ca.gov/Default.aspx), the property intersects with a 'Liquefaction Zone'. The house itself is approximately 50-60 feet back from the defined liquefaction zone. In the event of an earthquake, does the possibility of liquefaction increase the risk of damage to the house from this distance? Or would the house need to be inside the defined liquefaction zone to be at additional risk? Thank you for any clarification on this confusing subject! Matt
Question asked by: pps_matt

Asked on: 28 Nov 2010

Tough question! It comes down to appetite for risk and how much discount you get on the price for being in such a zone.

Sounds like only a decision you can make based on taking expert advice from someone who specialises in real estate in such zones.
By: knowitall
Replied at: 28 Nov 2010
Rate Answer

Comment or provide your answer to this question
No comments have been added to this question "How close is TOO close to a LIQUEFACTION ZONE?".

Ask a New Question

Find out more about Geology

Geology Questions and Answers

geology and atmosphere Questions and Answers

Next question: Hydrocarbon behavior

Become a Member! It's Free >>>

Share on Facebook: On Twitter: Twitter Tweet this!

Question Keywords

liquefaction zone

More Questions:

What Is The Difference Between The Geoid And The Surface Of The Earth?
What Causes The White Band Of Color Thru Dark Stone?
What The Longest Depth Can Be Measured Using Seismograph?
How Many Seismograph Stations Are Needed To Alocate The Epicenter Of An Earthquake?
What Is China Clay?